0.12/0.12	% Problem    : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.12/0.12	% Command    : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 240 THM
0.12/0.33	% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
0.12/0.33	% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
0.12/0.33	% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.12/0.33	% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
0.12/0.33	% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
0.12/0.33	% CPULimit   : 1920
0.12/0.33	% WCLimit    : 240
0.12/0.33	% DateTime   : Wed Jul 30 09:27:19 EDT 2025
0.12/0.33	% CPUTime    : 
0.19/0.47	Running higher-order theorem proving
0.19/0.48	Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=240 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.d3HlYBv2xj/E---3.1_12846.p
72.67/9.71	# Version: 3.0.0-ho
72.67/9.71	# Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSSSSNHHA.
72.67/9.71	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 8 cores with 240 seconds (1920 total)
72.67/9.71	# Starting full_lambda_6 with 720s (3) cores
72.67/9.71	# Starting post_as_ho1 with 240s (1) cores
72.67/9.71	# Starting lpo6_lambda_fix with 240s (1) cores
72.67/9.71	# Starting ho_unfolding_1 with 240s (1) cores
72.67/9.71	# Starting new_ho_10_unif with 240s (1) cores
72.67/9.71	# Starting ho_unfolding_2 with 240s (1) cores
72.67/9.71	# full_lambda_6 with pid 12924 completed with status 0
72.67/9.71	# Result found by full_lambda_6
72.67/9.71	# Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSSSSNHHA.
72.67/9.71	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 8 cores with 240 seconds (1920 total)
72.67/9.71	# Starting full_lambda_6 with 720s (3) cores
72.67/9.71	# SinE strategy is GSinE(CountTerms,hypos,4,,4,20000,1.0,true)
72.67/9.71	# Search class: HGUSS-FFSF21-DHHFFMBN
72.67/9.71	# partial match(2): HGHSS-FFSF21-SHHFFMBN
72.67/9.71	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 3 cores with 720 seconds (720 total)
72.67/9.71	# Starting sh2 with 324s (1) cores
72.67/9.71	# Starting full_lambda_6 with 73s (1) cores
72.67/9.71	# Starting full_lambda_3 with 81s (1) cores
72.67/9.71	# full_lambda_3 with pid 12932 completed with status 0
72.67/9.71	# Result found by full_lambda_3
72.67/9.71	# Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSSSSNHHA.
72.67/9.71	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 8 cores with 240 seconds (1920 total)
72.67/9.71	# Starting full_lambda_6 with 720s (3) cores
72.67/9.71	# SinE strategy is GSinE(CountTerms,hypos,4,,4,20000,1.0,true)
72.67/9.71	# Search class: HGUSS-FFSF21-DHHFFMBN
72.67/9.71	# partial match(2): HGHSS-FFSF21-SHHFFMBN
72.67/9.71	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 3 cores with 720 seconds (720 total)
72.67/9.71	# Starting sh2 with 324s (1) cores
72.67/9.71	# Starting full_lambda_6 with 73s (1) cores
72.67/9.71	# Starting full_lambda_3 with 81s (1) cores
72.67/9.71	# Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
72.67/9.71	
72.67/9.71	# Proof found!
72.67/9.71	# SZS status Theorem
72.67/9.71	# SZS output start CNFRefutation
72.67/9.71	thf(decl_sort1, type, a: $tType).
72.67/9.71	thf(decl_23, type, esk1_2: (a > $o) > (a > $o) > a).
72.67/9.71	thf(decl_24, type, epred1_0: (a > $o) > $o).
72.67/9.71	thf(decl_25, type, esk2_1: (a > $o) > a).
72.67/9.71	thf(decl_26, type, epred2_1: a > a > $o).
72.67/9.71	thf(decl_27, type, esk3_2: (a > a > $o) > a > $o).
72.67/9.71	thf(decl_28, type, esk4_1: (a > a > $o) > a).
72.67/9.71	thf(decl_29, type, esk5_1: (a > a > $o) > a).
72.67/9.71	thf(decl_30, type, esk6_1: (a > a > $o) > a).
72.67/9.71	thf(cTHM262_D_EXT_pme, conjecture, (![X1:(a > $o) > $o]:((((![X2:a > $o]:(((X1 @ X2)=>?[X3:a]:((X2 @ X3))))&![X4:a]:(?[X2:a > $o]:(((X2 @ X4)&(X1 @ X2)))))&![X4:a, X5:a, X2:a > $o, X6:a > $o]:(((X6 @ X5)<=(((((X1 @ X6)&(X2 @ X5))&(X6 @ X4))&(X2 @ X4))&(X1 @ X2)))))=>?[X7:a > a > $o]:(((^[X8:a > $o]:((?[X3:a]:((X8 @ X3))&![X4:a]:(((X8 @ X4)=>![X5:a]:(((X8 @ X5)<=>(X7 @ X4 @ X5))))))))=(X1)))))<=![X2:a > $o, X9:a > $o]:((![X1:(a > $o) > $o]:(((X1 @ X2)=>(X1 @ X9)))<=![X10:a]:(((X2 @ X10)<=>(X9 @ X10)))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.d3HlYBv2xj/E---3.1_12846.p', cTHM262_D_EXT_pme)).
72.67/9.71	thf(c_0_1, negated_conjecture, ~((![X2:a > $o, X9:a > $o]:((![X10:a]:(((X2 @ X10)<=>(X9 @ X10)))=>![X1:(a > $o) > $o]:(((X1 @ X2)=>(X1 @ X9)))))=>![X1:(a > $o) > $o]:((((![X2:a > $o]:(((X1 @ X2)=>?[X3:a]:((X2 @ X3))))&![X4:a]:(?[X2:a > $o]:(((X2 @ X4)&(X1 @ X2)))))&![X4:a, X5:a, X2:a > $o, X6:a > $o]:(((((((X1 @ X6)&(X2 @ X5))&(X6 @ X4))&(X2 @ X4))&(X1 @ X2))=>(X6 @ X5))))=>?[X7:a > a > $o]:(((^[Z0/* 8 */:a > $o]:((?[X3:a]:(Z0 @ X3)&![X4:a]:((Z0 @ X4=>![X5:a]:((Z0 @ X5<=>X7 @ X4 @ X5)))))))=(X1))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cTHM262_D_EXT_pme])])])).
72.67/9.71	thf(c_0_2, negated_conjecture, ![X25:a > $o, X26:a > $o, X28:(a > $o) > $o, X30:a > $o, X32:a, X34:a, X35:a, X36:a > $o, X37:a > $o, X38:a > a > $o]:((((~(X25 @ (esk1_2 @ X25 @ X26))|~(X26 @ (esk1_2 @ X25 @ X26))|(~(X28 @ X25)|(X28 @ X26)))&((X25 @ (esk1_2 @ X25 @ X26))|(X26 @ (esk1_2 @ X25 @ X26))|(~(X28 @ X25)|(X28 @ X26))))&((((~(epred1_0 @ X30)|(X30 @ (esk2_1 @ X30)))&((epred2_1 @ X32 @ X32)&(epred1_0 @ (epred2_1 @ X32))))&(~(epred1_0 @ X37)|~(X36 @ X35)|~(X37 @ X34)|~(X36 @ X34)|~(epred1_0 @ X36)|(X37 @ X35)))&((^[Z0/* 8 */:a > $o]:((?[X3:a]:(Z0 @ X3)&![X4:a]:((Z0 @ X4=>![X5:a]:((Z0 @ X5<=>X38 @ X4 @ X5)))))))!=(epred1_0))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])])])])])).
72.67/9.71	thf(c_0_3, negated_conjecture, ![X7:a > a > $o]:(((^[Z0/* 8 */:a > $o]:((?[X385:a]:((Z0 @ X385))&![X386:a]:(((Z0 @ X386)=>![X387:a]:(((Z0 @ X387)<=>(X7 @ X386 @ X387))))))))!=(epred1_0))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
72.67/9.71	thf(c_0_4, negated_conjecture, ![X7:a > a > $o]:(((?[X388:a]:((esk3_2 @ X7 @ X388))&![X389:a]:(((esk3_2 @ X7 @ X389)=>![X390:a]:(((esk3_2 @ X7 @ X390)<=>(X7 @ X389 @ X390))))))<~>(epred1_0 @ (esk3_2 @ X7)))), inference(neg_ext,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])).
72.67/9.71	thf(c_0_5, negated_conjecture, ![X1:(a > $o) > $o, X6:a > $o, X2:a > $o]:(((X2 @ (esk1_2 @ X2 @ X6))|(X6 @ (esk1_2 @ X2 @ X6))|(X1 @ X6)|~((X1 @ X2)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
72.67/9.71	thf(c_0_6, negated_conjecture, ![X3:a]:((epred1_0 @ (epred2_1 @ X3))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
72.67/9.71	thf(c_0_7, negated_conjecture, ![X7:a > a > $o, X4:a, X3:a]:(((epred1_0 @ (esk3_2 @ X7))|(X7 @ X3 @ X4)|~((esk3_2 @ X7 @ X4))|~((esk3_2 @ X7 @ X3)))), inference(dynamic_cnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])).
72.67/9.71	thf(c_0_8, negated_conjecture, ![X3:a, X2:a > $o]:(((epred2_1 @ X3 @ (esk1_2 @ (epred2_1 @ X3) @ X2))|(X2 @ (esk1_2 @ (epred2_1 @ X3) @ X2))|(epred1_0 @ X2))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5, c_0_6])).
72.67/9.71	thf(c_0_9, negated_conjecture, ![X3:a, X7:a > a > $o, X4:a]:(((epred2_1 @ X3 @ (esk1_2 @ (epred2_1 @ X3) @ (esk3_2 @ X7)))|(X7 @ X4 @ (esk1_2 @ (epred2_1 @ X3) @ (esk3_2 @ X7)))|(epred1_0 @ (esk3_2 @ X7))|~((esk3_2 @ X7 @ X4)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7, c_0_8])).
72.67/9.71	thf(c_0_10, negated_conjecture, ![X7:a > a > $o, X4:a, X3:a]:(((epred1_0 @ (esk3_2 @ X7))|(esk3_2 @ X7 @ X3)|~((esk3_2 @ X7 @ X4))|~((X7 @ X4 @ X3)))), inference(dynamic_cnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])).
72.67/9.71	thf(c_0_11, negated_conjecture, ![X7:a > a > $o]:(((esk3_2 @ X7 @ (esk6_1 @ X7))|(epred1_0 @ (esk3_2 @ X7)))), inference(dynamic_cnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])).
72.67/9.71	thf(c_0_12, negated_conjecture, ![X3:a]:(((epred2_1 @ X3 @ (esk1_2 @ (epred2_1 @ X3) @ (esk3_2 @ epred2_1)))|(epred1_0 @ (esk3_2 @ epred2_1))|~((esk3_2 @ epred2_1 @ X3)))), inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])).
72.67/9.71	thf(c_0_13, negated_conjecture, ![X1:(a > $o) > $o, X6:a > $o, X2:a > $o]:(((X1 @ X6)|~((X2 @ (esk1_2 @ X2 @ X6)))|~((X6 @ (esk1_2 @ X2 @ X6)))|~((X1 @ X2)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
72.67/9.71	thf(c_0_14, negated_conjecture, ![X7:a > a > $o, X3:a]:(((epred1_0 @ (esk3_2 @ X7))|(esk3_2 @ X7 @ X3)|~((X7 @ (esk6_1 @ X7) @ X3)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10, c_0_11])).
72.67/9.71	thf(c_0_15, negated_conjecture, ((epred2_1 @ (esk6_1 @ epred2_1) @ (esk1_2 @ (epred2_1 @ (esk6_1 @ epred2_1)) @ (esk3_2 @ epred2_1)))|(epred1_0 @ (esk3_2 @ epred2_1))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12, c_0_11])).
72.67/9.71	thf(c_0_16, negated_conjecture, ![X2:a > $o, X3:a, X4:a, X6:a > $o]:(((X2 @ X3)|~((epred1_0 @ X2))|~((X6 @ X3))|~((X2 @ X4))|~((X6 @ X4))|~((epred1_0 @ X6)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
72.67/9.71	thf(c_0_17, negated_conjecture, ![X2:a > $o, X6:a > $o]:((((X2)=(X6))|~((X6 @ (esk1_2 @ X2 @ X6)))|~((X2 @ (esk1_2 @ X2 @ X6))))), inference(eliminate_leibniz_eq,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[]), c_0_13])).
72.67/9.71	thf(c_0_18, negated_conjecture, ((esk3_2 @ epred2_1 @ (esk1_2 @ (epred2_1 @ (esk6_1 @ epred2_1)) @ (esk3_2 @ epred2_1)))|(epred1_0 @ (esk3_2 @ epred2_1))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14, c_0_15])).
72.67/9.71	thf(c_0_19, negated_conjecture, ![X2:a > $o, X4:a, X3:a, X5:a]:(((X2 @ X3)|~((epred2_1 @ X4 @ X5))|~((epred2_1 @ X4 @ X3))|~((epred1_0 @ X2))|~((X2 @ X5)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16, c_0_6])).
72.67/9.71	thf(c_0_20, negated_conjecture, ![X3:a]:((epred2_1 @ X3 @ X3)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
72.67/9.71	thf(c_0_21, negated_conjecture, (((epred2_1 @ (esk6_1 @ epred2_1))=(esk3_2 @ epred2_1))|(epred1_0 @ (esk3_2 @ epred2_1))), inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17, c_0_15]), c_0_18])).
72.67/9.71	thf(c_0_22, negated_conjecture, ![X2:a > $o, X3:a, X4:a]:(((X2 @ X3)|~((epred2_1 @ X4 @ X3))|~((epred1_0 @ X2))|~((X2 @ X4)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19, c_0_20])).
72.67/9.71	thf(c_0_23, negated_conjecture, ![X2:a > $o]:(((X2 @ (esk2_1 @ X2))|~((epred1_0 @ X2)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
72.67/9.71	thf(c_0_24, negated_conjecture, ![X7:a > a > $o, X3:a]:(((esk3_2 @ X7 @ (esk4_1 @ X7))|~((epred1_0 @ (esk3_2 @ X7)))|~((esk3_2 @ X7 @ X3)))), inference(dynamic_cnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])).
72.67/9.71	thf(c_0_25, negated_conjecture, (epred1_0 @ (esk3_2 @ epred2_1)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6, c_0_21])).
72.67/9.71	thf(c_0_26, negated_conjecture, ![X2:a > $o, X3:a]:(((X2 @ (esk2_1 @ (epred2_1 @ X3)))|~((epred1_0 @ X2))|~((X2 @ X3)))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22, c_0_23]), c_0_6])])).
72.67/9.71	thf(c_0_27, negated_conjecture, ![X3:a]:(((esk3_2 @ epred2_1 @ (esk4_1 @ epred2_1))|~((esk3_2 @ epred2_1 @ X3)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24, c_0_25])).
72.67/9.71	thf(c_0_28, negated_conjecture, ![X5:a, X4:a, X3:a, X2:a > $o]:(((X2 @ X3)|~((X2 @ (esk2_1 @ (epred2_1 @ X4))))|~((epred2_1 @ X5 @ X3))|~((epred2_1 @ X5 @ X4))|~((epred1_0 @ X2)))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19, c_0_26]), c_0_6])])).
72.67/9.71	thf(c_0_29, negated_conjecture, ![X2:a > $o, X3:a, X4:a]:(((X2 @ X3)|~((esk3_2 @ epred2_1 @ X4))|~((esk3_2 @ epred2_1 @ X3))|~((epred1_0 @ X2))|~((X2 @ X4)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16, c_0_25])).
72.67/9.71	thf(c_0_30, negated_conjecture, (esk3_2 @ epred2_1 @ (esk4_1 @ epred2_1)), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27, c_0_23]), c_0_25])])).
72.67/9.71	thf(c_0_31, negated_conjecture, ![X5:a, X4:a, X3:a]:(((epred2_1 @ X3 @ X4)|~((epred2_1 @ X5 @ X4))|~((epred2_1 @ X5 @ X3)))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28, c_0_23]), c_0_6])])).
72.67/9.71	thf(c_0_32, negated_conjecture, ![X3:a, X2:a > $o]:(((X2 @ X3)|~((esk3_2 @ epred2_1 @ X3))|~((X2 @ (esk4_1 @ epred2_1)))|~((epred1_0 @ X2)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29, c_0_30])).
72.67/9.71	thf(c_0_33, negated_conjecture, ![X4:a, X3:a, X2:a > $o]:(((X2 @ X3)|~((X2 @ (esk2_1 @ (epred2_1 @ X4))))|~((epred2_1 @ X4 @ X3))|~((epred1_0 @ X2)))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19, c_0_23]), c_0_6])])).
72.67/9.71	thf(c_0_34, negated_conjecture, ![X2:a > $o]:(((X2 @ (esk2_1 @ (epred2_1 @ (esk2_1 @ X2))))|~((epred1_0 @ X2)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26, c_0_23])).
72.67/9.71	thf(c_0_35, negated_conjecture, ![X4:a, X3:a]:(((epred2_1 @ X3 @ X4)|~((epred2_1 @ X4 @ X3)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31, c_0_20])).
72.67/9.71	thf(c_0_36, negated_conjecture, ![X2:a > $o]:(((X2 @ (esk2_1 @ (esk3_2 @ epred2_1)))|~((X2 @ (esk4_1 @ epred2_1)))|~((epred1_0 @ X2)))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32, c_0_23]), c_0_25])])).
72.67/9.71	thf(c_0_37, negated_conjecture, ![X7:a > a > $o]:((~((X7 @ (esk4_1 @ X7) @ (esk5_1 @ X7)))|~((esk3_2 @ X7 @ (esk5_1 @ X7)))|~((epred1_0 @ (esk3_2 @ X7))))), inference(condense,[status(thm)],[inference(dynamic_cnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])).
72.67/9.71	thf(c_0_38, negated_conjecture, ![X3:a]:(((epred2_1 @ (esk4_1 @ epred2_1) @ X3)|~((esk3_2 @ epred2_1 @ X3)))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32, c_0_20]), c_0_6])])).
72.67/9.71	thf(c_0_39, negated_conjecture, ![X3:a, X2:a > $o]:(((X2 @ X3)|~((epred2_1 @ (esk2_1 @ X2) @ X3))|~((epred1_0 @ X2)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33, c_0_34])).
72.67/9.71	thf(c_0_40, negated_conjecture, ![X3:a]:(((epred2_1 @ (esk2_1 @ (esk3_2 @ epred2_1)) @ X3)|~((epred2_1 @ X3 @ (esk4_1 @ epred2_1))))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_35, c_0_36]), c_0_6])])).
72.67/9.71	thf(c_0_41, negated_conjecture, ![X7:a > a > $o, X3:a]:(((X7 @ (esk4_1 @ X7) @ (esk5_1 @ X7))|(esk3_2 @ X7 @ (esk5_1 @ X7))|~((epred1_0 @ (esk3_2 @ X7)))|~((esk3_2 @ X7 @ X3)))), inference(dynamic_cnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])).
72.67/9.71	thf(c_0_42, negated_conjecture, ~((esk3_2 @ epred2_1 @ (esk5_1 @ epred2_1))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37, c_0_38]), c_0_25])])).
72.67/9.71	thf(c_0_43, negated_conjecture, ![X3:a]:(((esk3_2 @ epred2_1 @ X3)|~((epred2_1 @ X3 @ (esk4_1 @ epred2_1))))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_39, c_0_40]), c_0_25])])).
72.67/9.71	thf(c_0_44, negated_conjecture, ![X3:a, X4:a]:(((epred2_1 @ X3 @ X4)|~((epred2_1 @ (esk4_1 @ epred2_1) @ X3))|~((esk3_2 @ epred2_1 @ X4)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31, c_0_38])).
72.67/9.71	thf(c_0_45, negated_conjecture, ![X3:a]:(((epred2_1 @ (esk4_1 @ epred2_1) @ (esk5_1 @ epred2_1))|~((esk3_2 @ epred2_1 @ X3)))), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_41, c_0_25]), c_0_42])).
72.67/9.71	thf(c_0_46, negated_conjecture, ![X3:a]:(((esk3_2 @ epred2_1 @ X3)|~((epred2_1 @ (esk4_1 @ epred2_1) @ X3)))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_43, c_0_44]), c_0_30])])).
72.67/9.71	thf(c_0_47, negated_conjecture, (epred2_1 @ (esk4_1 @ epred2_1) @ (esk5_1 @ epred2_1)), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_45, c_0_23]), c_0_25])])).
72.67/9.71	thf(c_0_48, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_46, c_0_47]), c_0_42]), ['proof']).
72.67/9.71	# SZS output end CNFRefutation
72.67/9.71	# Parsed axioms                        : 2
72.67/9.71	# Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 1
72.67/9.71	# Initial clauses                      : 7
72.67/9.71	# Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
72.67/9.71	# Initial clauses in saturation        : 7
72.67/9.71	# Processed clauses                    : 3680
72.67/9.71	# ...of these trivial                  : 87
72.67/9.71	# ...subsumed                          : 2740
72.67/9.71	# ...remaining for further processing  : 853
72.67/9.71	# Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 98
72.67/9.71	# Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
72.67/9.71	# Backward-subsumed                    : 36
72.67/9.71	# Backward-rewritten                   : 59
72.67/9.71	# Generated clauses                    : 133794
72.67/9.71	# ...of the previous two non-redundant : 110751
72.67/9.71	# ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
72.67/9.71	# Contextual simplify-reflections      : 27
72.67/9.71	# Paramodulations                      : 132881
72.67/9.71	# Factorizations                       : 472
72.67/9.71	# NegExts                              : 17
72.67/9.71	# Equation resolutions                 : 98
72.67/9.71	# Disequality decompositions           : 0
72.67/9.71	# Total rewrite steps                  : 23909
72.67/9.71	# ...of those cached                   : 23618
72.67/9.71	# Propositional unsat checks           : 0
72.67/9.71	#    Propositional check models        : 0
72.67/9.71	#    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
72.67/9.71	#    Propositional clauses             : 0
72.67/9.71	#    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
72.67/9.71	#    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
72.67/9.71	#    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
72.67/9.71	#    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
72.67/9.71	#    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
72.67/9.71	#    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
72.67/9.71	#    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
72.67/9.71	#    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
72.67/9.71	# Current number of processed clauses  : 737
72.67/9.71	#    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 56
72.67/9.71	#    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
72.67/9.71	#    Negative unit clauses             : 2
72.67/9.71	#    Non-unit-clauses                  : 679
72.67/9.71	# Current number of unprocessed clauses: 106473
72.67/9.71	# ...number of literals in the above   : 996033
72.67/9.71	# Current number of archived formulas  : 0
72.67/9.71	# Current number of archived clauses   : 116
72.67/9.71	# Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 117991
72.67/9.71	# Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 47005
72.67/9.71	# Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 2779
72.67/9.71	# Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 379
72.67/9.71	# Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
72.67/9.71	# BW rewrite match attempts            : 431
72.67/9.71	# BW rewrite match successes           : 12
72.67/9.71	# Condensation attempts                : 3680
72.67/9.71	# Condensation successes               : 5
72.67/9.71	# Termbank termtop insertions          : 51999670
72.67/9.71	# Search garbage collected termcells   : 471
72.67/9.71	
72.67/9.71	# -------------------------------------------------
72.67/9.71	# User time                : 8.907 s
72.67/9.71	# System time              : 0.078 s
72.67/9.71	# Total time               : 8.985 s
72.67/9.71	# Maximum resident set size: 1916 pages
72.67/9.71	
72.67/9.71	# -------------------------------------------------
72.67/9.71	# User time                : 26.550 s
72.67/9.71	# System time              : 0.481 s
72.67/9.71	# Total time               : 27.031 s
72.67/9.71	# Maximum resident set size: 1740 pages
72.67/9.71	% E exiting
72.67/9.71	% E exiting
72.67/9.71	EOF